Cosmetic stability testing: requirements, test plan and documentation
A cosmetic product must stay safe and work as intended throughout its shelf life. Stability testing shows whether it does. The results belong in the safety report and justify the date of minimum durability or the period after opening on the label. This article shows what the Regulation and the Commission’s guidelines require and what a traceable test plan looks like.
In short: what does the EU require for stability testing?
Annex I, Part A, point 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 requires the safety report to cover the stability of the cosmetic product under reasonably foreseeable storage conditions. Under the Commission’s guidelines (Implementing Decision 2013/674/EU), the tests and their results should be included in the report, the method used to determine minimum durability should be described, and there should be evidence that the tested product corresponds to the one placed on the market. The Regulation does not prescribe specific test conditions.
Key takeaways
- Assess stability under reasonably foreseeable storage conditions
- Tests, results and minimum-durability method in the safety report
- Evidence that the tested composition matches the marketed product
- Include the packaging: purity, stability and interactions
- Results justify the minimum durability or the period after opening
Is your stability data spread across spreadsheets and image folders?
In 30 minutes we show you how VYVA ties test protocols to formula and batch and puts measured values next to the targets.
What the Regulation requires
The obligation follows from Article 10 and Annex I. Part A, point 2 of the Annex lists, for the safety report, the physical and chemical characteristics of the substances or mixtures and of the cosmetic product, and the stability of the cosmetic product under reasonably foreseeable storage conditions. Part A, point 4 adds the relevant characteristics of the packaging material, in particular purity and stability.
The Regulation sets no temperatures, durations or acceptance criteria. It requires an assessment that fits the product and can be followed in the safety report.
What the Commission’s guidelines specify
The guidelines on Annex I (Implementing Decision 2013/674/EU) state the purpose: to assess whether stability affects the safety and quality of the product, and to use that information to determine the minimum durability and the period after opening.
The safety report should therefore contain the method used to determine minimum durability, all data used to justify the indicated durability, and the description and results of the tests. In addition: evidence that the composition of the tested product corresponds to the product actually placed on the market, the results of a challenge test where applicable, and the period after opening with its justification where applicable.
Container and packaging
The guidelines quote the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS): stability tests should be adapted to the type of product and its intended use. To make sure the packaging causes no stability problems, physical stability tests are carried out with inert containers and with those intended to be used on the market.
Substances can also migrate from the packaging into the formula, which is why information on the packaging material is part of the assessment. A change of packaging supplier or material is a reason to reassess the data.
Minimum durability and period after opening
Article 19(1)(c) governs the label. Where minimum durability is 30 months or less, the date is given with “best used before the end of” or the symbol in Annex VII, as month and year or day, month and year, supplemented by storage conditions where necessary. Above 30 months the date is not mandatory; instead the label states how long the product can be used safely after opening.
Both particulars rest on the stability data. Whoever prints a date or a period after opening must be able to show in the safety report where it comes from.
How a test plan is structured
A test plan defines which samples are tested under which conditions at which time points, and which characteristics are measured or observed. Typical characteristics are appearance, colour, odour, pH, viscosity and phase separation, as well as changes to the packaging. Which conditions make sense depends on the product, the packaging and the markets.
Guidance comes from the technical report ISO/TR 18811:2018. It expressly does not specify conditions, parameters or criteria; it reviews literature on stability assessment and covers, among other things, batch scale, test conditions, physical and chemical changes, microbiological aspects, packaging interaction and evaluation. Defining and justifying the protocol remains the manufacturer’s task.
The tested sample must match the marketed product
In practice this requirement of the guidelines is the trickiest. Stability studies run for weeks or months, and the formula is often still being adjusted during that time. It then quickly becomes unclear which version was in the climate chamber and whether the results still apply to the product going to market.
Every sample should therefore be linked unambiguously to the formula version, the production batch and the packaging. If the formula changes afterwards, a professional judgement is needed on whether the existing data can be carried over.
Stability is not the same as a challenge test
Stability testing looks at whether the product keeps its physical, chemical and sensory properties. The preservation challenge test checks whether the preservation system controls a microbial challenge. Both results feed into the justification of shelf life, but they are separate tests with their own methods.
Documenting stability data digitally
In VYVA the formula carries the product specification: target pH, viscosity range, appearance, colour and odour. These targets appear in the test protocols next to the measured values instead of being retyped in every protocol. A test protocol belongs to a formula and a batch number and has its own sections for stability, climate stress, packaging compatibility, storage conditions, sensory evaluation and microbiology, plus a summary with approval. Photos and reports hang off the test.
This keeps visible which formula and batch were tested, what was measured and which decision followed. The professional judgement remains with people, the safety assessment with the qualified person.
Stability in the safety report: what goes where
| Stability under foreseeable storage conditions | Annex I, Part A, point 2 |
| Purity and stability of the packaging material | Annex I, Part A, point 4 |
| Tests, results, minimum-durability method | Guidelines 2013/674/EU, section 3.2.3 |
| Tested composition matches the marketed product | Guidelines 2013/674/EU, section 3.2.3 |
| Date of minimum durability or period after opening | Article 19(1)(c) |
| Guidance on choosing test methods | ISO/TR 18811:2018 (no criteria) |
Frequently asked questions
Sources
Disclaimer: This article is for general information only. It is not legal advice and not a regulatory or safety assessment of any individual case. We prepare the content carefully but give no warranty as to its accuracy, completeness or currency; legislation and standards may change after the date stated. Only the officially published text is binding. Make decisions about your products with qualified support, such as your safety assessor or legal adviser. We are liable for damage arising from the use of this information only in cases of intent and gross negligence; liability for injury to life, body or health and under mandatory statutory provisions remains unaffected.
Related articles
Testing & stability